Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Mauro

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided March 15, 1990PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peter J. Benitez, J.

The defendant was originally charged with the felonies of unauthorized practice of a profession in violation of Education *383Law § 6512 (1) and (2). In essence, defendant was charged with practicing and aiding and abetting others to practice massage without being licensed to do so under the Education Law. Each of these two counts was later reduced on motion of the People to an attempt to commit the crime of unauthorized practice of a profession, a class A misdemeanor.

Defendant moves to dismiss the information on several grounds. First, defendant argues…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. BoodenNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. CuozzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. In re Rodney J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. People v. KaminiskiCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. SyllaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1992
  2. People v. DioufCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1992
  3. People v. HellerCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
  4. Corines v. Superintendent, Otisville Correctional FacilityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
  5. People v. EbramhaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API