Legal Opinion

People v. Kaminiski

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided May 5, 1989PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold Beeler, J.

Defendant herein, charged with driving while intoxicated in violation of subdivisions (2) and (3) of Vehicle and Traffic Law *1090§ 1192, moves as part of an omnibus motion for dismissal of the accusatory instrument on the ground that it is facially insufficient pursuant to CPL 170.30, 170.35 and 100.40.

The principal questions for resolution on this motion to dismiss are twofold: (1) whether the CPL 60.50 "confession corroboration rule” applies to the legal sufficiency standards for misdemeanor information set forth in CPL 100.40 (1) (c); and (2) assuming the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. The People v. . JaehneNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. People v. LipskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. LyttonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. MauroCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1990
  2. People v. HellerCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
  3. People v. RossNew York Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. DolanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2003
  5. People v. OlwesCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API