Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bradley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1933No. Appeal 21PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, P. J.,

The defendant was tried for perjury. The foundation of the charge is found in the following facts: On April 19, 1932, a search warrant was issued and Russell Alexander was taken into custody charged with the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. On the same day a hearing was had before an alderman and, Edward Bradley, the defendant in the present case, was sworn and testified that he had purchased liquor from Alexander at his residence in Harrisburg. Sometime thereafter while the defendant was confined in the Dauphin County Prison on another charge, Alexander’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  2. Commonwealth v. BobanicSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  4. Powell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. State v. BlizeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RussoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Commonwealth v. RussoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Commonwealth v. HainesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. State v. WoolleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  5. Commonwealth v. SumrakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API