Commonwealth v. Russo
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Bell,
Four defendants were indicted for obstructing public justice and for perjury. The jury convicted all of them of obstructing justice and two of them of perjury. Their appeals were reviewed and, with one exception, correctly decided by the Superior Court in an able comprehensive opinion by Judge Hirt.* We allowed an allocatur in the case of Commonwealth v. Russo et al.
Defendants were police officers of the City of Pittsburgh and members of a special detail known as the Vice Squad. Although the defendants were tried separately, their appeals were argued together before…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KloiberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Commonwealth v. HomeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Williams v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Commonwealth v. BillingsleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LopinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Bergdoll v. KaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- People v. FitzpatrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Commonwealth v. LudwigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. WeitkampSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.