Commonwealth v. Sumrak
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Kenworthey, J.,
Mark Sumrak has appealed (from a conviction of perjury under the Penal Code. The indictment alleged that on June 2, 1940, while testifying under oath before a Grand Jury, he swore falsely that he did not know what he was signing when he signed a Communist Party petition. To support the conviction, the Commonwealth proved: (1) That when he subsequently testified at the trial in Commonwealth v. Antico et al., 146 Pa. Superior Ct. 293, 22 A. (2d) 204, he testified under oath that he did know what he was signing when he signed the petition; 2 and (2) that the petition he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. . Dunbar Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Bettman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Commonwealth v. AnticoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. HainesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth v. HadokSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RussoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Commonwealth v. RussoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Hogan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Oglesby v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Commonwealth v. GoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.