Fred Benioff Co. v. Benioff
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
Fred Benioff Co., a California corporation, engaged in the business of retailing ladies’ furs, fur garments and other types of women’s apparel in San Francisco and elsewhere, commenced this action for injunction and damages against defendant Fred Benioff claiming: (1) Infringement of United States registered trademark No. 236829 (Trademark Act of 1920, 41 Stat. 533, Ch. 104, 15 U.S.C.A. § 121 et seq.), being a label for use in connection with garments offered for sale and having inscribed thereon the words “Benioff’s Furs,” and (2) in a second cause of action, “unfair…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bank of the United States v. DeveauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bell v. HoodDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947
- R. P. Hazzard Co. v. Emerson's Shoes, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Bell v. HoodDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947