Legal Opinion

Bell v. Hood

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 2, 1947No. 2850PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

71 F.Supp. 813 (1947)

BELL et al.

v.

HOOD et al.

No. 2850.

District Court, S. D. California, Central Division.

May 2, 1947.

A. L. Wirin, of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs.

James M. Carter, U. S. Atty., of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants.

MATHES, District Judge.

This action was brought by Arthur L. Bell and other associates of "Mankind United", on behalf of that organization and themselves as individuals, against 37 special agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, one policeman of the city of Los Angeles and several "John Does."

Plaintiffs pray judgment for damages alleged to have been…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Bennett v. GravelleDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1971
  2. Willy H. Willis v. Thomas B. ReddinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Wills v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1961
  4. United States of America v. Cyril T. Faneca, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  5. Webster Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of NarcoticsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API