Coble v. Richardson Corp. of Greensboro

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

I

Defendant first argues that the trial court committed reversible error in concluding that defendant breached a duty to correct a drainage problem with plaintiffs house, which duty arose out of certain written and oral representations made by defendant. We overrule the assignments of error on which this argument is based.

A

As to the written representations, the record contains a document entitled “Construction Warranty.” This document is part of the entire, integrated contract; indeed, the defendant does not dispute that it was bound by the warranty, but rather that the…