McCorkle v. State Farm Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHANNELL, J.
Appellants Locke and Sumiré McCorkle sued respondents State Farm Insurance Company and agent Don R. Trudeau, alleging contract and tort causes of action. The trial court granted State Farm and Trudeau summary judgment on the contract cause of action and judgment on the pleadings on the tort claims. The McCorkles appeal, challenging both trial court rulings. We affirm the judgment.
I. Facts
Appellants Locke McCorkle and Sumiré H. Jacobs, also known as Sumiré McCorkle, own a residence in Mill Valley. In April 1976, Jacobs obtained homeowner’s insurance for the property from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Barbara A. v. John G.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Constance B. v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Sagadin v. RipperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Leach v. Home Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- County of Contra Costa v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- City of Morgan Hill v. Bay Area Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Stimson v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Calhoon v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.