Legal Opinion

Stimson v. Carlson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1992No. A054890PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REARDON, J

Appellant Michael R. Stimson appeals after summary judgment was granted in favor of respondent Thomas Carlson in Stimson’s action for negligence arising from injuries sustained in a sailboat accident. Stimson contends that (i) the doctrine of assumption of the risk does not bar his cause of action, and (2) even if the defense might bar recovery, a triable issue of fact exists precluding summary judgment. In June 1992, we affirmed the judgment in an unpublished opinion. Thereafter, our Supreme Court issued its decision in Knight v. Jewett (1992) 3 Cal.4th 296 [11 Cal.Rptr.2d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ross v. ClouserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. Howell v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Donohue v. San Francisco Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. McCorkle v. State Farm InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Cheong v. AntablinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Distefano v. ForesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Lackner v. NorthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Staten v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Barber v. Marina Sailing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API