Polk v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Conviction is for seduction. Punishment three years in the penitentiary.
An unfortunate situation seems to have arisen with reference to the bills of exception. Quite a number of bills appear in the record with qualifications and explanations appended. These bills were approved on the 25th day of June, 1921, and were filed the 7th day of July. One attorney representing appellant, on the 16th day of July 1921, makes an affidavit to the effect that the qualifications attached to the bills are not supported by the record; that they are unfair and unjust to appellant and attaches to the affidavit…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Knight v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Nash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Rosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Hinman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barrington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Jasper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Salas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926