Jasper v. State

ON REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Appellant makes vigorous complaint of our holding that his bills of exception do' not properly present any error because same do not set out the answers which would have been given, or which were given to the questions which appear in said bills. This court seems to have almost, if not uniformly, held that where the complaint is of the answer, such answer should appear in the bill. Charles v. State, 87 Texas Crim. Rep., 233; Taylor v. State, Id., 330; Pruitt v. State, 88 Texas Crim. Rep., 203; Gates v. State, Id. 570; Lane v. State, 89 Texas Crim. Rep., 140;…