Legal Opinion
Mire v. Hawkins
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 1, 1966No. 47843PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
We granted certiorari herein (248 La. 367, 178 So.2d 657) to review the. judgment of the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit (177 So.2d 795), limiting the grant to a consideration of whether designation of non-drilling areas, within drilling units created by orders of the Department of Conservation, constitutes an obstacle to the user of a mineral servitude on lands within these non-drilling areas, thereby suspending the liberative prescription running against the mineral servitude.
The pertinent facts are as follows: Veon Mire and his wife Euchariste Savoy had six children. At…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jumonville Pipe & MacHinery Co. v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Le Blanc v. Haynesville Mercantile Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Mire v. HawkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Boddie v. DrewettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
3Cited by24 opinions
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Central Pines Land Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Nunez v. Wainoco Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Amoco Production Co. v. ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Henson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.