Legal Opinion · Dissent

Holly Ridge Associates, LLC v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 2006No. COA03-1686Published

1DissentJackson, Judge

For the reasons stated below, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion.

Initially, Petitioner argues that it was legal error for the Administrative Law Judge (“ALT’) to allow the North Carolina Shellfish Growers Association (“Shellfish Growers”) and the North Carolina Coastal Federation (“Coastal Federation”) to intervene in this matter. The majority has determined that this case must be analyzed pursuant to the legislature’s explicit statutory provisions governing intervention in a contested case petition. See supra. Although I agree with the majority that it is appropriate to analyze…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Empire Power Co. v. N. C. Department of EnvironmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Meads v. North Carolina Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Hilliard v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. United States v. Duke Energy CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API