Franklin v. Incorporated Village of Floral Park
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment declaring unconstitutional the building zone ordinance of the Village of Floral Park as applied to plaintiffs’ land, reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, complaint dismissed on the law, and judgment declaring that the ordinance is valid is directed in favor of the Village on its counterclaim, with costs. In our opinion, in the light of the physical facts and the undisputed facts as to income, the evidence shows that plaintiffs are not being deprived of any substantial beneficial or profitable use of their land. Not considering the $1,500 income formerly received from the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Matter of Fox Meadow Estates, Inc. v. CulleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Fox Meadow Estates, Inc. v. CulleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Brown v. Village of OwegoNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- MATTER OF CROSSROADS RECREATION v. BrozNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Ulmer Park Realty Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Braunsdorf v. KelleherNew York Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.