Lockard v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
33 Cal.2d 453 (1949)
CHARLES C. LOCKARD et al., Respondents,
v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Appellant.
L. A. No. 20383.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Feb. 1, 1949.
Ray L. Chesebro, City Attorney, Bourke Jones and Roger Arnebergh, Assistant City Attorneys, and Thos. H. Hearn, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellant.
Albert H. Allen and Hyman Goldman for Respondents.
GIBSON, C.J.
This is an appeal by the city of Los Angeles from a judgment declaring certain provisions of a comprehensive zoning ordinance invalid and void insofar as it affects the use of a strip of property twelve blocks long within which…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- California Building Industry Ass'n v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Hardesty v. Sacramento Metro. Air Quality Mgmt. Dist.District Court, E.D. California · 2018