Smith v. United States
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
It is at once apparent that the names of the witnesses of the defendant by whom facts may be established, is sought, and not records and documents pertaining to the disability of the deceased. The Supreme Court in Carpenter v. Winn, 221 U. S. 540, 31 S. Ct. 683, 686, 55 L. Ed. 842, said: “The court will require reasonable proof of the possession and of the pertinency of the papers. If the object of the party is to avail himself of the provision of the section, so as to move for a nonsuit, or for judgment by default, he must put the party on his guard, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carpenter v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. Bitter Root Development Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- J. H. Day Co. v. Mountain City Mill Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1915
- F. Speidel Co. v. N. Barstow Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1916
- Wolcott v. National Electric Signaling Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Keith v. Endicott Johnson Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935