Legal Opinion

Keith v. Endicott Johnson Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 18, 1935No. 255PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

The action at law, in aid of which the bill of discovery was filed, claims damages in the aggregate of $1,000,000 on one hundred causes of action, half of which sound in contract and half in tort. The plaintiff is the owner of patents on cementing apparatus used in the manufacture of shoes. The defendant is a large shoe manufacturing corporation to which he claims to have leased certain of his patented machines. By the terms of the alleged leases, the defendant was to pay a rent or royalty computed at a stated rate per pound on all adhesives used in connection with the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Wolcott v. National Electric Signaling Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1916
  3. Kinney v. RiceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1916
  4. Goodrich Zinc Corporation v. CarlinDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1925
  5. A. W. Feeser, Inc. v. American Can Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Graffis v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  2. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. American Rolling Mill Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  3. Doe v. Board of Trustees for the University of ArkansasDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API