Legal Opinion

Lahn v. Vaisbort

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 18, 2016No. 10CV0382ST; A154575PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevore, J.

Plaintiff Alexis Scharff appeals from a judgment entered for defendant Edward Vaisbort after the trial court granted his motion for summary judgment against plaintiffs claims for breach of contract, professional negligence, and securities fraud.1 Her claims arose when she provided a renewed loan to a real estate entity, then learned, upon its default, that her loan was essentially unsecured. Defendant had drafted the transaction documents.

As to each of her claims, plaintiff separately assigns error to the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment. We reject without written discussion…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, LLPOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hale v. GroceOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. McEvoy v. HeliksonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Badger v. Paulson Investment Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O'Kain v. LandressCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Jensen v. Hillsboro Law Group, PCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Sound Foundation v. SCI Fund II, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API