Legal Opinion

Harris v. Averick

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Lett, J.

Plaintiff has instituted this stockholder’s derivative action in her own behalf and in behalf of all other stockholders of defendant United States Hoffman Machinery Corporation similarly situated, and on behalf of Hoffman Machinery. Certain defendants had heretofore moved to dismiss the original complaint on the grounds that plaintiff had no legal capacity to sue and that the allegations of said complaint did not excuse lack of demand upon defendant corporation to bring an action. The court (Creehberg, J.) granted the motion to dismiss, with leave to serve an amended complaint, stating: “ A…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sage v. . CulverNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Russell v. BooksNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Harris v. AverickNew York Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hamilton Partners, L.P. v. EnglardCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2010
  2. Harris v. AverickNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API