Legal Opinion

Russell v. Books

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1959PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

In this action, there are two plaintiffs, wife and husband. There are nine defendants, but for present purposes they can be placed and shall be considered in three groups: Marboro Books and Friend, Reiss, McGrlone Advertising, both hereinafter jointly referred to as Marboro; Springs Mills, Inc., The Springs Cotton Mills, and C. L. Miller Company, Inc., hereinafter referred to collectively as Springs; and Promenade Magazines, Inc., Cowles Magazines, Inc., The Curtis Publishing Company, and Curtis Circulation Company, all together hereinafter referred to as Magazines. (“ John Doe ”, fictitious,…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Gautier v. Pro-Football, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Spiegel v. SchulmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  4. Boscaglia v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Neuberg v. BobowiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API