Legal Opinion

Duke Sanitarium v. Hearn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 14, 1932No. 22467PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Logan county rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Clyde Hearn, against the defendant the Duke -Sanitarium, a corporation, and Dr. C. B. Hill, in the sum of $5,200. The action was for damages on account of negligence alleged against said defendants in permitting plaintiff’s heel to be burned by a hot water bottle while plaintiff was a patient at the Duke Sanitarium, a corporation, which was managed by Dr. C. B. Hill as its superintendent. It appears that the plaintiff was received at the sanitarium on November 26, 1928, in a weakened…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Champion v. KiethSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  2. Priestley v. StaffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. Sauers v. SmitsWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Hillcrest Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Eversole v. Oklahoma Hospital Founders Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Hillcrest Medical Center v. WierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Orthopedic Clinic v. HansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Quick v. Benedictine Sisters Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API