Legal Opinion

Bruso v. Pinquet

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1948No. Docket No. 35, Calendar No. 43,955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

This suit is brought to impress a trust in favor of plaintiff upon government bonds of a maturity value of $15,650 registered in the ¿name of plaintiff’s wife, Margaret Bruso, now deceased, and of her niece, defendant Edna M. Pinquet, and held by defendant Fred Koenig, and also upon the sum of $3,300 in cash held by defendant Koenig as special administrator of the estate of Margaret Bruso and claimed by defendants to be an asset of said estate, of which defendant Pinquet is made sole beneficiary under decedent’s will.

Plaintiff, an invalid over 80 years of age, and his wife, who died August…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morris v. VyseMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Connor v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Kaine v. WeigleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  4. Ridky v. RidkyMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Detroit Trust Co. v. HockettMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Village of Wood Creek FarmsMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Adado v. AssidMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Kopprasch v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Lappo v. NegusMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Shell Oil Co. v. City of LivoniaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API