Legal Opinion
Smith v. Village of Wood Creek Farms
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 4, 1963No. Calendar 12, 13, Docket 49,752, 49,753PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.
Plaintiffs are owners of outlots A. and B of Supervisor’s Plat of Wood Creek Farms’ ¿nd outlots C and D of Supervisor’s Plat of Wood Creek Farms No. 1 in defendant village. They seek, in 2 cases, one as to outlot A and the other as to outlots B, C, and D, to enjoin enforcement as to those outlots of a zoning ordinance classifying the lots as “Residence No. 1”, which is the classification of the entire square mile composing the village. Defendants filed cross-bills seeking to enjoin plaintiffs from advertising and maintaining signs, on the lots indicating that they are zoned “restricted…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- City of North Muskegon v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Long v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Ervin Acceptance Co. v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Ed Zaagman, Inc. v. City of KentwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Puritan-Greenfield Improvement Ass'n v. LeoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Reibel v. City of BirminghamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Palmer v. Township of SuperiorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.