Legal Opinion
State v. Rolax
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 11, 1985No. 51262-1, 51263-9, 51264-7, 51282-5PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
Ronald Rolax, Absalom Israel, Terry Marsh, and Francisco Munoz all separately petition from decisions affirming their criminal convictions. In the cases of Rolax, Israel, and Marsh, a Court Commissioner in Division One of the Court of Appeals granted the State's motions on the merits. Munoz' case was put on Division Three's "show cause" docket, and his conviction was then affirmed in a ruling authored by a Court Commissioner. In each case, the Court of Appeals denied a motion to modify the Commissioner's ruling. Rolax, Israel and Marsh challenge the constitutionality of the RAP 18.14 motion…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Streater v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- State v. TheobaldWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Detention of PetersenWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In re the Detention of PetersenWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. VerharenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.