Legal Opinion

Securities And Exchange Commission v. Richman

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 3, 2021No. 3:21-cv-01911Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No. 21-cv-01911-CRB COMMISSION, 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 10 DISMISS v. 11 JESSICA RICHMAN, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 The SEC alleges that Defendants Jessica Richman and Zachary Apte, co-founder’s 15 of uBiome, misled investors about fundamental aspects of uBiome’s business model 16 during the company’s Series C funding round. Complaint (“Compl.”) (dkt. 1). Defendants 17 move to dismiss the complaint, primarily arguing that the SEC fails to support its 18…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Bly-Magee v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Regina Warshaw and John D. Kaufman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Xoma Corporation Steven C. MendellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Joan C. Howard v. Everex Systems, Inc., Steven L.W. Hui Michael C.Y. Wong Wong's International (Holdings) Limited Gatcombe Corp. N.V.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API