Legal Opinion

Kirkwood v. Decorah

Ho-Chunk Nation Trial Court

Decided February 11, 2005No. CV 04-33PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*190ORDER (Partially Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment)

TODD R. MATHA, Associate Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The Court must determine whether to grant the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. The Court enters a decision partially in favor of the plaintiff, but requires further discovery and submission of legal memoranda to fully address some remaining issues. The below discussion reflects the Court’s careful examination of this case.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Court recounts the procedural history in significant detail in its October 18, 2004 Order (Granting Plaintiff's Motion). For purposes of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White v. DayHo-Chunk Nation Trial Court · 2008
  2. Chamberlain v. HallHo-Chunk Nation Trial Court · 2009
  3. Cleveland v. GarvinHo-Chunk Nation Trial Court · 2009
  4. Ho-Chunk Nation v. Ho-Chunk Nation Grievance Review BoardHo-Chunk Nation Trial Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API