Legal Opinion
Zahringer v. Zahringer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 11, 2003No. SC 16795PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly affirmed the judgment of the trial court based upon the Appellate Court’s determination that the record was inadequate for review. The defendant, George J. Zahringer, appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the trial court’s judgment modifying an unallocated alimony and support order in favor of the plaintiff, Celia Zahringer. Zahringer v. Zahringer, 69 Conn. App. 251, 793 A.2d 1214 (2002). The defendant had contended on appeal that the trial court improperly had…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Community Action for Greater Middlesex County, Inc. v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- McGuinness v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Rubin v. RubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Unkelbach v. McNarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Schmidt v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Perez-Dickson v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Vine v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Advanced Financial Services, Inc. v. Associated Appraisal Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Misthopoulos v. MisthopoulosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.