Legal Opinion

Yaesu Electronics Corp. v. Tamura

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 8, 1994No. B071550PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), J.

Introduction

This appeal contests that portion of a judgment which set aside as a fraudulent conveyance Yukio Tamura’s gift of $243,206 to his sons made one month after a jury had returned a verdict compelling him to pay in excess of $2 million. Because the funds were derived from a defined benefit pension plan, Yukio Tamura maintained that the moneys were entitled to the statutory exemption from execution accorded private retirement plans by section 704.115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. After taking evidence, the trial court, relying upon In re Bloom (9th Cir. 1988)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Edith Bloom, M.D., Debtor. Edith Bloom, M.D. v. Gilbert Robinson, Chapter 7 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,229 in Re Ceferino G. Cheng, Debtor. Ceferino G. Cheng v. David A. Gill, Trustee Kenneth Robert FraserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Kirkeby v. Superior Court of Orange CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Tatung Co. v. Shu Tze HsuDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
  4. Simson v. Burkart (In Re Simpson)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Schwartzman v. WilshinskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API