Legal Opinion

Schwartzman v. Wilshinsky

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1996No. B097347PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

This is an appeal from an order made after judgment, by which the court below denied appellant’s claim of exemption as to all funds held in his individual retirement account (IRA), except an amount determined to be required for the payment of taxes, and as to all employee contributions and matching employer contributions held in the 40IK profit-sharing account established by appellant’s employer. Appellant seeks reversal on the grounds that the trial court’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence and that the court erred in interpreting the terms “self-employment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Gray v. Don Miller & Associates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Yaesu Electronics Corp. v. TamuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In the Matter Of: Fred Lieberman (Deceased) and Florance Lieberman, Debtors. Florance Lieberman v. Robert Hawkins, Chapter 7 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Gonzales v. Davis (In Re Davis)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Simson v. Burkart (In Re Simpson)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Series AGI West Linn of Appian Group Investors DE, LLC v. EvesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. In Re RogersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API