Legal Opinion

Cummins v. Walden

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1837PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from the Sioitzerland Probate Courts

1Opinion of the Court

n Blackford, J.—Assumpsit

Assumpsit by Walden against Cummins and another, administrators of Hagan, for a demand which accrued in the life-time of the intestate. Pleas, 1st. The general issue; 2dly, Payment with notice of set-off. ’ Verdict and judgment for the defendants. A new trial was then granted, and a verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff.

The granting of the new trial is the only error assigned.

The new trial was granted on an affidavit made by the plaintiff This affidavit states,—that the evidence of one of the defendants’ witnesses, who testified that she had heard the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. Horton v. RoeNew York Supreme Court · 1812
  2. Maguire v. SmockIndiana Superior Court · 1871

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HendricksIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Helm v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Manion v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SponierIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API