St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a Corporation v. Peter C. Walter, Betty Walter Allen, Jean Walter Davisson, and Daisy E. Walter
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
The issue is the ownership of a tract of land included in a grant to the predecessor of the Railroad and claimed by the appellees-plaintiffs (herein referred to collectively as the Walter Group) on the grounds that the grant was an easement, that the easement has terminated, and that they, as owners of the servient estate, hold the tract free of the easement. The Railroad contends that the easement has not terminated and that, if it has, the Railroad has title by adverse possession. Each party sought to quiet its title. The trial court entered an appropriate decree…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wisconsin Central Railroad v. Price CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United States v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- McGrath v. EichoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- United States v. DrumbCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. The City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. The City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Tindle v. LinvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Seminole Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- The Choctaw and the Chickasaw Nations v. Board of County Commissioners of Love County, Oklahoma, and Texaco, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.