Legal Opinion

Combs v. DuBois

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 20, 1982No. 2 CA-CIV 4418PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

The main issue in this case is whether appellees DuBois presented sufficient evidence to show that they had acquired Comb’s land by adverse possession.

In 1974 Combs bought 161 acres of vacant land from the estate of Etta Hooker. This property was landlocked, being surrounded by the property owned by appellees DuBois. When DuBois refused to grant Combs an easement of ingress and egress through their property, Combs filed a complaint seeking a private way of necessity pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1201. Appellee Brush was later brought in as a defendant since part of the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Bruni v. VidaurriTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Kerlin v. Tensaw Land & Timber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Shirey v. WhitlowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. De Las Fuentes v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Terral v. BrooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Cottonwood v. James L. Fann Contracting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. Long v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. Kocher v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. Lewis v. Pleasant Country, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. Ponderosa Plaza v. SiplastCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API