Clinton v. Miller
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Creek County; Ernest B. I-Iuglies, Judge. Action by Ambrose Miller and another against Fred S. Clinton and others to cancel a deed. From judgment for plaintiffs the defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtRainet, J.
This is an action instituted by Ambrose Miller and his wife, Alice Miller, against Dr. Fred S. Clinton, J. H. Clinton, Paul Clinton, and the Sapulpa Refining Company, to cancel a deed executed by the plaintiffs to the defendant Fred S. Clinton to an undivided one-fourth interest in the allotment of the plaintiff, Ambrose Miller. In this case it was alleged that a conspiracy existed between Fred S. Clinton and Paul Clinton to obtain plaintiff’s land without an adequate consideration; that plaintiff’s mind had become impaired by the excessive use of intoxicating liquors and that he was under…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zeigler v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Schock v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Daniel v. TolonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Woodbury v. WoodburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Crump v. LanhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Lewis v. SchaferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Clinton v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Lamb v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Hodge v. SheaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.