Legal Opinion

Slate v. Saxon, Marquoit, Bertoni & Todd

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 2000No. 9609-06865; CA A99631PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*3DEITS, C. J.

In this breach of contract action, plaintiff appeals from a judgment granting summary judgment in favor of defendants. On appeal, plaintiff argues that defendants breached an agreement to hire him and, in the alternative, that he is entitled to recover damages under a promissory estoppel theory. We affirm.

On review of a summary judgment, we determine whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and, examining the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ORCP 47 C; Jones v. General…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Lewis v. Oregon Beauty Supply Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Taylor v. Multnomah County Deputy Sheriff's Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. May v. Harris Management Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Cocchiara v. Lithia Motors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Petitte v. DSL. Net, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. Cocchiara v. Lithia Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. Rushing v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API