Rushing v. SAIF Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Plaintiff initiated this action against SAIF Corporation 1 for breach of contract and denial of due process under 42 USC section 1983, arising out of SAIF’s rescission of an offer of employment. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment; plaintiff argued that he had a constitutionally protected expectation of employment, while SAIF argued that it is an at-will employer that may withdraw employment offers at any time. The trial court agreed with SAIF and entered judgment dismissing the claims. Plaintiff appeals, and we affirm.
The relevant facts are undisputed. For 27 years,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Lewis v. Oregon Beauty Supply Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Maddox v. Clackamas County School District No. 25Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Washburn v. Columbia Forest Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peterson v. SnodgrassDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010
- Titus v. City of Prairie CityDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011