Legal Opinion
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 27, 1996No. 88 Civ. 4486 (DNE)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement of an action commenced by plaintiff United States of America (“the Government”) against, inter alia, defendants International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“the IBT” or “the Union”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14,1989 (“Consent Decree”). Pursuant to the Rules and Procedures for Operation of the Independent Review Board for the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IRB Rules”), ¶ 0, the Independent Review Board (“IRB”) has made an…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States of America, Charles M. Carberry v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Ron Carey & William HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. International Brotherhood Of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Erbacci, Cerone, and Moriarty, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.