Legal Opinion
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 30, 1997No. 88 Civ. 4486(DNE)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement of an action commenced by the United States of America against, inter alia, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IBT” or “the union”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board. The settlement is embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (“Consent Decree”). The goals of the Consent Decree are to rid the IBT of the hideous influence of organized crime and establish a culture of democracy within the union. The long history of this case has been set forth in this Court’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Butz v. Glover Livestock Commission Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Finnegan v. LeuSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Schonfeld v. PenzaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States of America, Charles M. Carberry v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Ron Carey & William HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Afl-Cio, Ron CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & HelpersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.