Legal Opinion
Lockwood v. a C & S, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 14, 1986No. 14422-7-I; 14444-8-I; 14475-8-I; 14478-2-I; 14504-5-I; 14573-8-IPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
This is an appeal by Raymark Industries, lnc. , from a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs Albert and Dorothy Lockwood (hereinafter Lockwood) for injuries resulting from Albert Lockwood's prolonged exposure during the course of his employment to asbestos products of which Raymark was a principal manufacturer. On appeal, Raymark's primary assignments of error are directed to the admission or sufficiency of evidence but, nevertheless, raise difficult and novel legal issues relating to the application of products liability law to asbestos products and exposure thereto.
Lockwood worked in…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Aubrey Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Lockwood v. a C & S, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
- Sholtis v. American Cyanamid Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Simonetta v. Viad Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.