Legal Opinion

Newman v. Bitter Root Irrigation District

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1933No. 7,154PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of nonsuit. The action is one to recover damages for injury to land and crops as the result of alleged negligence on the part of defendant in the construction and maintenance of its irrigation canal. The trial court, in sustaining the motion for nonsuit, ruled that the complaint was insufficient to state a cause of action. The sufficiency of the complaint was first challenged by demurrer and again by objection to the introduction of evidence. We shall, therefore, first consider the sufficiency of the complaint.

In general, it alleges that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thaanum v. Bynum Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Lewiston Orchards Irrigation District v. GilmoreIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Stephenson v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Buffalo Rapids Irrigation District v. ColleranMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Watts v. Billings Bench Water Assn.Montana Supreme Court · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Goshen Irrigation District v. HuntWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Richland County v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Rhodes v. WeigandMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Butler v. Paradise Valley Irr. DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Richland County v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API