Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Herrall

United States Circuit Court

Decided May 26, 1884PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action to Recover Possession of Real Property.

1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff, a citizen of the state of California, to recover the possession of lot 3, in block B, in Portland Homestead. It was commenced against Jacob Fisher, a citizen of Oregon. After the cause was at issue, Fisher died, and on February 22, 1084, his death was suggested to the court and supported by the affidavit of the plaintiff’s attorney, whereupon the action, on motion of the latter, was continued against the executor of the deceased, George Herrall. This is according to the practice pre*365scribe* l in such cases by tiro Oregon Code of Civil Procedure, § 37,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pillow v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. McCready v. Sexton & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  3. Remington v. LinthicumSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  4. Martin v. ColeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  5. Bosworth v. DanzienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. City Ry. Co. v. BeardDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1922
  3. Oregon Railroad v. Umatilla CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Clatsop County v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Nind v. MyersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API