Legal Opinion

City Ry. Co. v. Beard

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 5, 1922No. 41PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATER, District Judge.

The plaintiff, an Ohio corporation, seeks to enjoin the defendant, individually and as treasurer of Montgomery county, from the collection of a tax levied in the year 1920. Prior to the 1st of March in that year the plaintiff filed'with the tax commission its annual report. The commission fixed a tentative value of $2,970,220 on its property. On a hearing based on plaintiff’s written application the valuation was reduced to $2,938,850. A subsequent rehearing was had, and a further reduction in assessable value was refused. The county auditor in an appropriate manner…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Cummings v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. United States v. FerreiraSupreme Court of the United States · 1852

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pierce v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. Bunten v. Rock Springs Grazing Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. State Ex Rel. McKittrick v. American Colony InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  5. Connecting Gas Co. v. ImesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API