Legal Opinion

State v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1987No. 8611SC1095PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

I

Defendant, by his first Assignment of Error, argues that the allegations contained in the indictment returned against him were fatally insufficient to charge the alleged offenses. We disagree.

G.S. 15A-924(a)(5), prescribes the requirements for a criminal indictment, in pertinent part, as follows:(a) A criminal pleading must contain:

[[Image here]](5) A plain and concise factual statement in each count which, without allegations of an evidentiary nature, asserts facts supporting every element of a criminal offense and the defendant’s commission thereof with sufficient precision…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. State v. LooneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. RozierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re S.R.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. State v. MandinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. McHoneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. Taurice Marquese CrispCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API