State v. Hicks
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
I
Defendant, by his first Assignment of Error, argues that the allegations contained in the indictment returned against him were fatally insufficient to charge the alleged offenses. We disagree.
G.S. 15A-924(a)(5), prescribes the requirements for a criminal indictment, in pertinent part, as follows:(a) A criminal pleading must contain:
[[Image here]](5) A plain and concise factual statement in each count which, without allegations of an evidentiary nature, asserts facts supporting every element of a criminal offense and the defendant’s commission thereof with sufficient precision…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- State v. LooneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. RozierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re S.R.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. MandinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. McHoneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. Taurice Marquese CrispCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.