Legal Opinion
Schuessler v. Wolter
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided May 24, 2012No. Nos. 11CA0093, 11CA0125, 11CA0126PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CASEBOLT.
4 1 In these malpractice and workers' compensation insurance bad faith cases, which were consolidated and tried together, defendants, James Wolter, M.D. (Wolter) and Pin-nacol Assurance (Pinnacol), appeal the judgments entered on jury verdicts in favor of plaintiff, Michael Schuessler (Schuessler), who also cross-appeals certain trial court rulings. We reverse the judgment against Wol-ter and remand for a new trial as to him. We affirm the judgment against Pinnacol in part, reverse it in part, and remand for further proceedings.
I. Facts
T2 Schuessler, a property…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Goodson v. American Standard Insurance Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Vaccaro v. American Family Insurance GroupColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Burns v. McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- International Insurance v. American Empire Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- People v. PollardColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. ConyacColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Home Loan Investment Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Core-Mark Midcontinent, Inc. v. Sonitrol Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. ShifrinColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.