Legal Opinion
Maryland Department of Human Resources v. Sullivan
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 23, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-1607 SSHPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
In July of 1989, the Maryland Department of Human Resources filed a complaint challenging defendants’ use of Program Instruction No. 82-06 (PI 82-06) as arbitrary and capricious. Defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings and for dismissal. Plaintiffs filed a cross-motion for judgment, asking this Court to invalidate PI 82-06, to remand for further proceedings, and to award to plaintiffs fees and costs incurred as a result of a request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Upon consideration of defendants’ motion, plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Richard Pickus v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- National Automatic Laundry and Cleaning Council v. George P. Shultz, Secretary, U. S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Gilbert A. Cuneo v. Donald H. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Nationwide Building Maintenance, Inc. v. Arthur Sampson, Administrator, U. S. General Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Bigwood v. DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCYDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Arizona v. ShalalaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Northwestern University v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.