Legal Opinion
Arizona v. Shalala
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 23, 2000No. CIV.A. 99-00860 (HHK)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KENNEDY, District Judge.
The States of Arizona, Maryland, New York, Tennessee, Michigan, and Florida 1 (collectively “plaintiffs”) filed this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent the enforcement of Action Transmittal 98-2 (“AT 98-2”), issued by the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (“the Secretary” or “HHS”) and the HHS Assistant Secretary for Management and Budget. Plaintiffs contend that AT 98-2, which applies existing government-wide cost allocation principles to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bonaccorsy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- St AZ v. Thompson, Tommy G.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Catalyst & Chemical Services, Inc. v. Global Ground SupportDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Di Lella v. University of the District of Columbia David A. Clarke School of LawDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of La. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.