Rabinovitz v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
This is an action in damages commenced by the plaintiff, Carl Taylor, against the defendants, B. Rabinovitz and Ida Rabinovitz, to recover for loss sustained due to a grass fire. On a trial to a jury a verdict was returned for the plaintiff for $720, and judgment being entered thereon, defendants appeal presenting seven allegations of error in two general specifications: (1) There is no evidence to sustain the finding of the trial court that the grass was set by the defendant; (2) the court erred in giving certain instructions.
There is a third allegation of error which arises upon the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lawson v. Anderson & Kerr Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- City of Altus v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Lusk v. HaleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Williams v. LeforceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Minnehoma Oil & Gas Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ralston v. TuckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958