Legal Opinion

Rabinovitz v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 29, 1942No. 30638PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an action in damages commenced by the plaintiff, Carl Taylor, against the defendants, B. Rabinovitz and Ida Rabinovitz, to recover for loss sustained due to a grass fire. On a trial to a jury a verdict was returned for the plaintiff for $720, and judgment being entered thereon, defendants appeal presenting seven allegations of error in two general specifications: (1) There is no evidence to sustain the finding of the trial court that the grass was set by the defendant; (2) the court erred in giving certain instructions.

There is a third allegation of error which arises upon the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lawson v. Anderson & Kerr Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. City of Altus v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Lusk v. HaleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Williams v. LeforceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Minnehoma Oil & Gas Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ralston v. TuckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API