Legal Opinion

Lusk v. Haley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 27, 1919No. 9230PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from District Court, Murray County; F. B. gwank, Judge. Action by Anna Haley against James W. Lusk and others, receivers. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action for damages for personal injuries resulting in death, commenced by the defendant in error, Anna Haley, plaintiff below, widow of the decedent, against James W. Lusk, W. C. Nixon and W. B. Biddle, receivers of the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad, a corporation, plaintiffs in error, defendants below. Hereafter, for convenience, the parties will be designated “plaintiff” and “defendant,” respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.

Upon trial to a jury there was a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $20,000, upon which judgment was duly rendered, and to reverse…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. WolfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Sand Springs Railway Co. v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Allen v. Oklahoma State Bank of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API