Legal Opinion

Minnehoma Oil & Gas Co. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 19, 1929No. 18389PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIEEENDAPEER, O.

Defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, commenced this action against plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover damages alleged to have been caused by defendant setting out a fire on its oil and gas leasei adjoining plaintiff’s orchard, from whence the fire is alleged to have spread to plaintiff’s orchard, whereby the trees on about five acres thereof were damaged.

Defendant, on the 25th day of March, 1925, was the owner and in possession of an oil and gas lease covering the south 100 acres of the N. E. 1-4, sec. 24, twp. 21 N., R. 7…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Midland Valley R. Co. v. RupeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Adams v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Seaboard Air Line Railway, Co. v. CharpiaSupreme Court of Florida · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. VanierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Okmulgee Supply Corporation v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Hynds v. SchaffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  4. Rabinovitz v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Rabinovitz v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API