Legal Opinion

Williams v. Leforce

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 20, 1936No. 24173PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This suit was instituted in the district court of Craig county by plaintiff in error for the recovery of a debt and foreclosure of a mortgage given to secure the same. The defendants in error J. S. Leforce, Sarah Leforce, and E. E. Le-foree, who will hereinafter be referred to simply as defendants, filed their answer admitting the execution of the note and mortgage sued on in plaintiff’s petition. They further pleaded that the note sued on had been fully settled, paid and discharged by the execution and delivery of a quitclaim deed from defendants to plaintiff, which was delivered to J. W.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ely Walker Dry Goods Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Gaar, Scott & Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Ginner & Miller Publishing Co. v. N. S. Sherman MacHine & Iron WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Reed v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Peoples Bank of Pratt, Ks. v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Elam v. Town of LutherCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Miller v. Troy Laundry MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. UNIFUND CCR, LLC v. EKPOCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
  4. IN RE AMENDMENTS TO THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS - CIVILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  5. IN RE AMENDMENTS TO THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS - CIVILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API